Comments on: It’s another rollover http://peschronicles.co.uk/2008/04/29/tues-294/ ...and FIFA Chronicles too Thu, 08 Jan 2009 11:54:03 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7 hourly 1 By: Adriano http://peschronicles.co.uk/2008/04/29/tues-294/comment-page-1/#comment-1154 Adriano Wed, 30 Apr 2008 18:00:07 +0000 http://peschronicles.co.uk/?p=321#comment-1154 I think there might be a penalty, but it's only noticeable when you play, for example, a defender upfront or an attacker in defense. It's probably all due to the attack and defense stats and a couple of others. Not to mention the abilities starts like d-line, marking, sliding etc. I think there might be a penalty, but it’s only noticeable when you play, for example, a defender upfront or an attacker in defense. It’s probably all due to the attack and defense stats and a couple of others. Not to mention the abilities starts like d-line, marking, sliding etc.

]]> By: not-Greg http://peschronicles.co.uk/2008/04/29/tues-294/comment-page-1/#comment-1149 not-Greg Wed, 30 Apr 2008 12:08:23 +0000 http://peschronicles.co.uk/?p=321#comment-1149 stinger - I think I remember many PESes ago a discussion on PESfan about whether there was a penalty for playing players out of position (i.e. in a role not on their list of alternates), and the consensus was that there must be a penalty, otherwise there'd be no point in having positions. Personally I don't think there is a penalty, or if there is then it's so slight that it makes no difference anyway. stinger - I think I remember many PESes ago a discussion on PESfan about whether there was a penalty for playing players out of position (i.e. in a role not on their list of alternates), and the consensus was that there must be a penalty, otherwise there’d be no point in having positions. Personally I don’t think there is a penalty, or if there is then it’s so slight that it makes no difference anyway.

]]> By: stinger http://peschronicles.co.uk/2008/04/29/tues-294/comment-page-1/#comment-1146 stinger Wed, 30 Apr 2008 10:04:00 +0000 http://peschronicles.co.uk/?p=321#comment-1146 My 3 strikers often don't play in the positions they are technically classed as being in. I really don't think there is a major difference whether the position is listed as CF, WF or SS. My RWF is technically another CF and I usually have a player who has their position listed as CF there, same goes for the SS. My 3 strikers often don’t play in the positions they are technically classed as being in. I really don’t think there is a major difference whether the position is listed as CF, WF or SS. My RWF is technically another CF and I usually have a player who has their position listed as CF there, same goes for the SS.

]]> By: not-Greg http://peschronicles.co.uk/2008/04/29/tues-294/comment-page-1/#comment-1145 not-Greg Tue, 29 Apr 2008 22:11:49 +0000 http://peschronicles.co.uk/?p=321#comment-1145 Am I the only one who plays all three front players in a 4-3-3 as CFs? I do this regardless of whether the players' primary positions are SS or WF or whatever. I know it's wrong, but it feels so right... Whenever Giggs plays up front on the left for me, he plays as a CF. I don't think CF is even one of his alternate positions. Am I the only one who plays all three front players in a 4-3-3 as CFs? I do this regardless of whether the players’ primary positions are SS or WF or whatever. I know it’s wrong, but it feels so right…

Whenever Giggs plays up front on the left for me, he plays as a CF. I don’t think CF is even one of his alternate positions.

]]> By: stinger http://peschronicles.co.uk/2008/04/29/tues-294/comment-page-1/#comment-1144 stinger Tue, 29 Apr 2008 22:00:39 +0000 http://peschronicles.co.uk/?p=321#comment-1144 I have also found 4-4-2 a little bit ineffective in the past no matter how I use it. For whatever reason I just can't seem to play and score with a formation that doesn't use 3 strikers (Usually a CF, a SS and a RWF). It just feels like you have less options up front. At the same time I like to have a strong Midfield, hence me favoring the 3-4-3, only problem being it requires really good defenders and a brilliant DMF to use effectively I have also found 4-4-2 a little bit ineffective in the past no matter how I use it. For whatever reason I just can’t seem to play and score with a formation that doesn’t use 3 strikers (Usually a CF, a SS and a RWF). It just feels like you have less options up front.

At the same time I like to have a strong Midfield, hence me favoring the 3-4-3, only problem being it requires really good defenders and a brilliant DMF to use effectively

]]>